Autonomic Networking – from theory to practice[OMNET++ SIMULATION PROJECT]

Autonomic Networking – from theory to practice

In this sense, the students reveal not only as participants but also as judges of the work presented by their classmates, Autonomic Networking – from theory to practice demanding good materials and presentations that allow them an easy introduction to the topic addressed. Student Evaluation The final individual evaluation is based on continuous and individual assessment. Continuous group assessment:

Autonomic Networking – from theory to practice This is entirely carried out in small self-selected groups of three to five students, often groups of friends. The assessment consists of a set of exercises, case studies , Autonomic Networking – from theory to practice readings, and a thematic project relevant to the course. Individual assessment consists of the individual presentation of one part of the thematic project and a final exam. Autonomic Networking – from theory to practice The final exam tests the material covered both in the seminars and in the projects. Since the continuous assessment is carried out in groups, at the beginning of the course, the group members must commit to the score they intend to attain by signing an “involvement agreement” Autonomic Networking - from theory to practice The internal regulations of the UPM require lecturers to give a final examination; Autonomic Networking – from theory to practice the aim of the involvement agreement is thus to ensure that the students follow the continuous assessment.

The characteristics of the course are such that continuous assessment was considered more appropriate than a final examination, so this contract is used to get the students’ buy-in while motivating them from the very start. The individual final rating of each student see equation is obtained from the following scores. Autonomic Networking – from theory to practice The continuous assessment of the group work, comprising the project and average score given to the exercises, case studies, and readings . The continuous assessment also takes into account if the layout and format of the delivered documents conforms to the given template see equation The individual assessment evaluates the oral presentation of the project work and the individual final

Autonomic Networks  from theory to practice

A numeric factor integrates the subjective evaluation of the lecturer , a score given by the classmates evaluating the project presentations , and the adjustment of the final score obtained in the continuous group assessment to the initial commitment The scores range from while factors range from . The commitment factor ensures that the students complete the continuous assessment tasks with an effort at least equal to their original commitment. The final score is calculated by subsequent normalization in the range , and the students pass the course if they get  points or more.

Should a student group fail the course with a continuous assessment score over  points on the scale, the group activities cannot be repeated, and the students only have to repeat the individual final exam. If their continuous assessment score is below  points, they must individually develop and present a new thematic project and also repeat the individual final exam; the rest of scores obtained during the course are kept. Students have only two opportunities per year to pass the course. A student who fails both of these has to re-enroll in the next academic year.

Seminar Contents Seminar I introduces both the main topics of the course the concepts of accessibility, usability, Design for All, and the Principles of Universal Design The PUD were developed by the Center for Universal Design in collaboration with a consortium of universal design researchers and practitioners from the U.S. The PUD are valid for application in a wide range of