VANET via Named Data Networking[OMNET++ SIMULATION PROJECT]

VANET via Named Data Networking

Accessibility Wizard, accessibility options such as StickyKeys, FilterKeys, SerialKeys, MouseKeys, RepeatKeys, Slow-Keys, BounceKeys ToggleKeys, SoundSentry, ShowSounds, screen keyboard, VANET via Named Data Networking magnifier, configuration options such as color contrast, resolution, fonts and icons size, pointing icons, left- and right-hand mouse, Braille and Speech Application Program Interfaces is dedicated to hardware and software accessibility criteria This seminar proposes simple solutions to overcome some of the VANET via Named Data Networking hardware and software problems pointed out. VANET via Named Data Networking These guidelines are mainly based on the principles of compatibility, configurability, perceivability, understandability, operability, and robustness. VANET via Named Data Networking Seminar  introduces theWeb accessibility criteria proposed by the World Wide Web Consortium as an of example of software accessibility. The Web Accessibility Initiative realized that people with different kinds of disabilities often have difficulties in using the Web.

These might be related both to a combination of barriers in the presentation of VANET via Named Data Networking Web pages and to barriers in the user “agents” , multimedia players, or assistive technologies such as screen readers or voice recognition WAI developed theWeb Content Accessibility Guidelines that can help to ensure that Web pages are widely accessible, in particular by users with disabilities and special needs. VANET via Named Data Networking This seminar ends by proposing simple solutions to overcome some of these problems. introduces usability in the design of software interfaces. This seminar ends by proposing simple solutions that overcome some of the most common problems typographic mistakes, Web writing and content quality, page layout and visual design  positioning of the elements, user orientation inaWeb site, naming of HTMLfiles, protecting forms from spam, search usability, feedback and error tolerance, user registration, and so checkpoints are analyzed in this seminar COURSE EVALUATION: SURVEYS AND ACADEMIC RESULTS Enrollment in DACIS typically includes electrical and electronics engineering and computer science graduates and other graduates with a background in ICT Since the course began in enrollment has ranged students, with an average of as a reference, there are approximately new students each year beginning this Master’s Program

VANET via Named Data Network

Although it is difficult to provide an objective evaluation of the course, some indicator figures of merit for the course are provided as indicators. These include the academic results obtained by the students during the four academic years that the course has been and the results of the surveys filled in by the students. Academic Results Two figures of merit to evaluate the course are the dropout rate and the success rate, defined as follows. Thesuccess rate is the ratio of the number of students who passed to the number of students who took the course an the subsequent evaluation. The success rate has been given for both the first and second call per academic year.

Thedropout rate is the ratio of the number of students who dropped out to the number of students enrolled. A course can be considered successful if not only are the average grades good, but the success rate is high and the dropout rate low. During the four years, all students passed the course SUCCESS AND DROPOUT RATE Average rank in the last four academic years. either at the first or the second attempt; see Table III. In terms of the dropout rate, the vast majority of the students enrolled finished the course, except for three students in the academic year On a scale from the ranking for the students’ first attempt in the academic years In terms of the average grade, the results were very encouraging respectively, for the four course sessions analyzed.